Abortion: the quiet violence of Ferrara Francesca de Carolis Just a quick thought. Speaking of tones and words. Of grace of form and substance abuse. Listening to the speech by Giuliano Ferrara in the opening episode of the infidel Wednesday, February 13. A poster about his 'pro-life' with which makes abortion among the themes of the campaign.
a very calm tone of Ferrara. Introduces, explains, argues, his voice flat and quiet, curls gently modulating phrases and words, it seems, even breaths. Without ever leaving the rails of a supply of extreme kindness. Even when he has, which is normal to happen, to have to try to overpower some of the guests to speak. Quietly, of course, if you want to calm the accoratezza not turned into fervor, then that is not transcended in screams, brandished crucifixes, or excesses such
... Yet. The calm can sometimes be frightening. If it's formal language that is of substantial violence.
And next to violence to break into campaign with an issue so sensitive and painful, I felt, in the words of Ferrara, the words of a raging private, for my feeling unacceptable.
As was obvious, the speech went to the unfortunate episode of the blitz in the hospital of Naples Federico II. I found a great violence to describe the feeling with lucid sweetness 'the child that the fetus would have been'. As this had not already thought of a grieving woman who is faced with the terrible choice to have an abortion. What is thought and inner pain that should not be tortured by others in front of a camera. With the aggravating circumstance in the case, there was talk of a particular individual, especially the fate of her child that was not.
again. How many times was given the name of the woman. Ten, twenty, I do not know ... maybe only five times ... It was a personal name, however, that it bounced all the time that endless speech. But how do we use words and names? How and when we are allowed to call someone else, you do not know and you do not have any confidence, with the first name as you would with a dear friend, for example ... I could not help but wonder if was watching TV, what that woman must have felt, to be called stubborn so calm, when in fact it was transformed into an emblem of 'what not to do'.
I thought of the incredible violence of hearing his name, uttered repeatedly, repeatedly, stripped almost to the person ... I heard it, on me as to any person, not the violence of a desired confidence, every time like a knife ...
really creaked in the cold calmness of speech, the word 'love', too often repeated.
But how do we use names and words ... Nothing really has nothing to do with this story, but instead I was just wondering about a name 'is not pronounced', just an hour before another news organization, perhaps much ec'entra with 'adroitness' instead sometimes there are instinctively.
Listening to the Tg1 20.00, also on February 13. The titles announced, among other things, the arrest of a former regional minister of Calabria. Question of intertwining between the Mafia and politics. I wonder what party to belong to the commissioner, and wait for the announcement of the service. Waiting for the service. But nothing. To find the acronym (for the record Udeur) I have to go rummaging on the Internet. Different story, of course, anything interesting, certainly. Who ever would be interested to know that name? Why say it? After all, just an acronym. And then, we are campaigning ...
Source: Article 21
